Detectives again confronted Terreona with the route data. Her phone had been in Hudson after midnight, remained on Todd's street through the night, and then left around the time witnesses heard the shots. Todd's missing phone followed the same path. A few minutes later, her device was moving near Macedonia at highway speed, and Todd's phone later went dark.
They also reminded her of the 911 call. The call had been made from her phone while it was at Todd's address, within the narrow window established by the neighbors. There had been no conversation with dispatch, which suggested the emergency feature might have been activated accidentally during the incident. For investigators, that accidental contact with police was one of the strongest time stamps in the entire case.
Terreona still refused to provide a narrative. She said she did not know the address, did not recognize Todd, and did not understand the evidence. When detectives tried a softer approach and told her they believed something unexpected might have happened, she did not take the opportunity to claim self-defense, accident, panic, or the involvement of another person. She continued denying the basic connection.
That denial forced investigators to rely more heavily on reconstruction. The witnesses placed an unfamiliar light-colored car at the property before dawn. They heard a sequence of loud sounds and saw a long-haired, smaller-framed person moving between the house and the vehicle. The 911 system recorded a call from Terreona's phone at 7:21, and the car left within minutes.
Inside, Todd had been shot seven times. The weapon itself was not found at the house. His phone was missing while other valuable property remained. The master bedroom contained evidence of recent intimate activity, and DNA connected Terreona to that room.
Outside, a bloody shoe print did not match the first responders. The broken door frame appeared inconsistent with the way officers had entered. None of those clues alone identified a killer, but together they showed movement through the house that police could not attribute to Todd or to the emergency response. By the time detectives interviewed Terreona, they were no longer trying to decide whether there had been another person inside.
The financial timeline sharpened the motive question without fully answering it. A small payment had been completed, and a much larger one was attempted around the same time as the shooting and departure. Investigators could see that money was part of the interaction, but the source does not establish a complete conversation explaining exactly why the second payment was initiated or why the confrontation turned violent. That gap remained one of the central mysteries of the case.
Terreona's behavior after the killing became part of the circumstantial picture. Investigators said she altered her phone setup, searched whether police could still track a device after a SIM was removed, and repeatedly monitored news about the Hudson homicide. Her phone's movements were already preserved by provider data, so changing the device afterward could not erase the earlier history. The more detectives confronted her with those records, the less plausible a complete lack of memory appeared to them.
The detectives also returned to the fact that Todd's phone disappeared. Its last movements paralleled Terreona's route away from Hudson. Police searched but did not recover it, leaving investigators to infer why it was removed and where it was discarded. The source presents the synchronized travel as evidence that whoever left with Terreona's device also carried Todd's phone away from the scene.
At several points, Terreona challenged the premise that witnesses had actually seen her. Detectives responded that witnesses had described the vehicle and its damage, while digital records put her phone at the address. The case did not depend on anyone across the street clearly recognizing her face. It depended on many separate pieces of evidence converging on the same time and place.
The prosecution would eventually have far more than the impression of suspicious behavior. It had forensic testing, device history, financial transactions, surveillance and Ring-camera timing, witness statements, and the connection between ammunition at the scene and a firearm associated with Terreona. Even without a confession, those pieces created a case strong enough to move forward.
The interrogation itself showed how detectives tested each explanation rather than simply announcing their conclusion. When Terreona tried to distance herself from one of the phones, officers asked exactly where the device had been found. They told her it had been charging on a wall in her bedroom and that another phone had been lying on the bed. Terreona suggested one might belong to her daughter, but investigators said they had not taken a device from the child's hand and would return any property that truly belonged to her.
That exchange mattered because the phone was not merely a piece of property. It contained searches, location history, photographs, dating-app records, and questions about police tracking. When detectives showed Terreona images of Todd and his address that had appeared in the search history, she said she did not recognize them and did not know how they had appeared. The officers kept returning to the same basic point: the device in her room had been used to look for information connected directly to the dead man.
The Bumble records made the denial harder to maintain. On April 16, the account associated with Terreona had sent Todd a greeting and later asked whether he wanted to exchange numbers. The account identified the woman as Siobhan, a name Terreona acknowledged was connected to her. Todd agreed to the exchange and provided his phone number, yet when detectives placed the chat in front of her, Terreona said she did not remember the conversation or the man in the profile.
Investigators did not immediately shout or threaten her. Instead, they tried to create room for an explanation. They said relatives described her as a good mother and a person who did not fit the image of someone capable of a calculated killing. They suggested that perhaps something happened inside Todd's home that looked worse from the outside than it actually was. If there had been a confrontation, panic, fear, or some other unexpected event, they told her this was the opportunity to say so.